<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Breaking Changes on API Coding</title>
    <link>https://apicoding.com/tags/breaking-changes/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Breaking Changes on API Coding</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://apicoding.com/tags/breaking-changes/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Changes: How to Avoid Shipping Them and What to Do When You Must</title>
      <link>https://apicoding.com/2026/03/23/breaking-changes-how-to-avoid-shipping-them-and-what-to-do-when-you-must/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://apicoding.com/2026/03/23/breaking-changes-how-to-avoid-shipping-them-and-what-to-do-when-you-must/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A breaking change is any modification to an API that requires consumers to update their integration to continue functioning. The definition is straightforward. The practice of avoiding breaking changes while evolving an API requires engineering discipline that most teams underestimate until they have shipped a breaking change to a production API and experienced the resulting incident response.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The instinct to avoid defining something as a breaking change is strong. Removing a field that is not documented is tempting to classify as cleanup rather than a breaking change. Changing an error code from 400 to 422 for a validation failure seems like a trivial semantic correction. Adding a required field to a request body seems like a new feature rather than a breaking change. Each of these reclassifications is wrong, and each produces consumers whose integrations fail after the change.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>API Versioning Strategies That Don&#39;t Break Your Consumers</title>
      <link>https://apicoding.com/2025/09/22/api-versioning-strategies-that-dont-break-your-consumers/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://apicoding.com/2025/09/22/api-versioning-strategies-that-dont-break-your-consumers/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;API versioning is the discipline that separates API providers who have operated public APIs for several years from those who have not. Early-stage API design focuses on what the API should do. Mature API design focuses on how the API will evolve without breaking the consumers who have built on top of it. The difference in focus reflects a difference in experience with the consequences of getting it wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Breaking changes are changes that require consumers to modify their integration to continue functioning. They include removing endpoints, removing fields from responses, changing field names, changing data types, changing authentication requirements, and changing the semantics of existing parameters. Every team that has shipped a breaking change to a public API without a migration path has received the same feedback from affected consumers, expressed with varying degrees of professionalism.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
